Changes

m
Line 471: Line 471:  
**The loss is 30% with 1 RADAR-carrying ship; 24% for 2 RADAR-carrying ship, and 20% if 3 or more ships are carrying RADAR.
 
**The loss is 30% with 1 RADAR-carrying ship; 24% for 2 RADAR-carrying ship, and 20% if 3 or more ships are carrying RADAR.
 
**Note that it counts ''the number of ships carrying RADAR'', not ''number of RADAR carried''. Thus if multiple RADARs are equipped for Maelstrom-offsetting, they must be spread among multiple ships.
 
**Note that it counts ''the number of ships carrying RADAR'', not ''number of RADAR carried''. Thus if multiple RADARs are equipped for Maelstrom-offsetting, they must be spread among multiple ships.
**The type of RADAR does not affect the effectiveness of loss mitigation; thus, [[Type 21 Air RADAR]] and [[Type 22 Surface RADAR]] which are both easy to obtain is sufficient for this purpose.
+
**The type of RADAR does not affect the effectiveness of loss mitigation; thus, [[Type 21 Air RADAR]] and [[Type 22 Surface RADAR]] - both easy to obtain - are sufficient for this purpose.
 
*The amount lost displayed is the ''highest'' amount lost by ships in fleet. It is not the number lost by all ships.
 
*The amount lost displayed is the ''highest'' amount lost by ships in fleet. It is not the number lost by all ships.
 
*On the Resupply screen, the reason why the number of bars shown may differ between ships may be due to maximum loss value and/or rounding down.
 
*On the Resupply screen, the reason why the number of bars shown may differ between ships may be due to maximum loss value and/or rounding down.
 
*Remember that loss of fuel and ammo [[#Effects_of_Amount_of_Resources_Carried|lowers ship performance in combat]].
 
*Remember that loss of fuel and ammo [[#Effects_of_Amount_of_Resources_Carried|lowers ship performance in combat]].
1,424

edits