cssedit, Moderators, prechecked, Account Reviewers
23,057
edits
- Welcome to the Kancolle Wiki!
- If you have any questions regarding site content, account registration, etc., please visit the KanColle Wiki Discord
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: − + − + Line 42:
Line 42: + + + Line 50:
Line 53: − + − ** This means equipment LoS is 3 times more important in 6-2 and 6-3 compared to 2-5 and 4 times as important in 3-5 and 6-1.+ − ** Ship LoS is less effective in those maps with higher equipment weight modifiers.+ − *In 2-5, F33(C<sub>n</sub>=1) have to be 31< to have a chance to enter boss and 33≤ to guarantee branching to the boss.+ − *In 6-2, F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3) have to be 43> to guarantee F>H and 40< to guarantee H>K.+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Calculating LoS
=Calculating LoS=
=Calculating LoS=
===Formula 33===
===Formula 33===
Similar to the New Fall Simplified formula, but reportedly more accurate. Using this model, a value of 31 eLoS would guarantee failing the 2-5 LoS check, while a value of 33 eLoS would succeed 100% of the time. It is described as follows<ref>http://ja.kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/%E3%83%9E%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E7%B4%A2%E6%95%B5</ref>:
Similar to the New Fall Simplified formula, but reportedly more accurate. It is described as follows<ref>http://ja.kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/%E3%83%9E%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E7%B4%A2%E6%95%B5</ref>:
<math>
<math>
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
\phi &= \sum_{s \in \text{Ships}} \sqrt{L_s} + C_{n} \sum_{l \in \text{Slots}}C_{l} ( S_{l} + S_l^{\star} ) - \lceil 0.4 H \rceil + 2M \\
\phi &= \sum_{s \in \text{Ships}} \sqrt{L_s} + C_{n} \sum_{l \in \text{Slots}}C_{l} ( S_{l} + S_l^{\star} ) - \lceil QH \rceil + 2M \\
S_l^{\star} &= C_l^{\star} \cdot \sqrt{\bigstar_l}
S_l^{\star} &= C_l^{\star} \cdot \sqrt{\bigstar_l}
\end{align}
\end{align}
**This is calculated by multiplying <math>C_l^{\star}</math>, the improvement multiplier of that equipment, with the square root of the equipment's improvement level.
**This is calculated by multiplying <math>C_l^{\star}</math>, the improvement multiplier of that equipment, with the square root of the equipment's improvement level.
***The improvement multiplier of Small Radars is 1.25, Large Radars is 1.4, Reconnaissance Seaplanes is 1.2, and Searchlight is 0 (that is, it receives no eLoS bonus when improved)
***The improvement multiplier of Small Radars is 1.25, Large Radars is 1.4, Reconnaissance Seaplanes is 1.2, and Searchlight is 0 (that is, it receives no eLoS bonus when improved)
*<math>Q</math> is the HQ level modifier. This varies depending on the map.
** It is 0.35 in 5-2 and 6-3.
** Assume 0.4 otherwise.
*<math>H</math> is your HQ level. The result is rounded up to the nearest whole number.
*<math>H</math> is your HQ level. The result is rounded up to the nearest whole number.
*<math>M</math> is the number of empty ship slots in your fleet.
*<math>M</math> is the number of empty ship slots in your fleet.
* Depending on the map, equipment is weighted with more importance.
* Depending on the map, equipment is weighted with more importance.
* It is denoted as C<sub>n</sub> in the formula.
* It is denoted as C<sub>n</sub> in the formula.
* For all tested nodes, C<sub>n</sub> for 2-5 is 1, for 3-5 and 6-1 are 4, for 6-2 and 6-3 are 3.
* See the [[#Estimated LoS|table below]] for C<sub>n</sub> values used by each map.
* Ship LoS is less effective in those maps with higher equipment weight modifiers.
===Estimated LoS===
''Data sourced from [http://kc.piro.moe/nav/#/ TsunDB]. Values are the lowest and highest reported LoS for routing. Please note that there may be some margin of error due to random routing.''
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|-
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |Map
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |C<sub>n</sub>
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |Origin Node
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |Lower Threshold
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |Upper Threshold
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |Destination Node
!style="text-align: center; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; background-color:#99CCFF;" |Notes
|-
|[[World_1#1-6|1-6]]
| 3
| M
| 29.7
| 159.6
| J
| Failing LoS or not meeting composition requirements routes to L.
|-
|rowspan="3"| [[World_2#2-5|2-5]]
|rowspan="3"| 1
| G
| 37.3
| 87.8
| L
| Failing LoS routes to K.
|-
| I
| 31.2
| 59.4
| O
| Failing LoS routes to H.
|-
| J
| 42.4
| 91.2
| O
| Failing LoS routes to H.
|-
|rowspan="2"| [[World_3#3-5|3-5]]
|rowspan="2"| 4
| G
| 24
| 337
| K
| Failing LoS routes to I.
|-
| H
| 39.1
| 321.4
| K
| Failing LoS routes to J.
|-
|rowspan="2"| [[World_7#7-2|7-2]]
| ??
| E
| -32.1
| 136.5
| G
| Failing LoS routes to F. Appears to be fixed routing based on composition but still plays the LoS routing animation.
|-
| 4
| I
| 66.1
| 294.5
| M
| Failing LoS routes to L.
|-
|rowspan="3"| [[World_4#4-5|4-5]]
|rowspan="2"| 2
| K
| 64.8
| 146.5
| T
| Failing LoS routes to L.
|-
| Q
| 62
| 167
| N/O
| Failing LoS routes to P. '''Low number of reports.'''
|-
| ??
| O
| 62
| 167
| T
| Failing LoS routes to N. Appears to be fixed routing based on composition but still plays the LoS routing animation.
|-
|rowspan="2"| [[World_5#5-2|5-2]]
|rowspan="2"| 2
| F
| 64
| 147
| O
| Failing LoS routes to H.
|-
| L
| 73.8
| 81
| K
| Failing LoS routes to N. '''Low number of reports.'''
|-
|rowspan="2"| [[World_5#5-4|5-4]]
|rowspan="2"| 2
| L
| 57
| 185
| P
| Failing LoS routes to N.
|-
| M
| 42.3
| 150.1
| P
| Failing LoS routes to O.
|-
|rowspan="2"| [[World_5#5-5|5-5]]
|rowspan="2"| 2
| O
| 63.8
| 134.5
| S
| Failing LoS routes to R.
|-
| P
| 74.4
| 167.7
| S
| Failing LoS routes to Q.
|-
|rowspan="3"| [[World_6#6-1|6-1]]
|rowspan="3"| 4
| G
| 16.7
| 218.1
| H
| Failing LoS routes to I.
|-
| H<br>(With [[Taigei]])
| 25.4
| 201.4
|rowspan="2"| K
|rowspan="2"| Failing LoS routes to E.
|-
| H<br>(Without [[Taigei]])
| 23.3
| 218.1
|-
|rowspan="3"| [[World_6#6-2|6-2]]
|rowspan="3"| 3
| E
| 46
| 179.8
| J
| Failing LoS routes to I.
|-
| H
| 42.8
| 42.8
| K
| Failing LoS routes to G. '''Low number of reports.'''
|-
| I
| 35.7
| 205.8
| K
| Failing LoS routes to G.
|-
|[[World_6#6-3|6-3]]
| 3
| E
| 19.4
| 180
| G
| Failing LoS routes to F. Routing is heavily influenced by composition as well.
|-
|rowspan="2"| [[World_6#6-5|6-5]]
| 3
| G
| 56.3
| 196.2
| M
| Failing LoS routes to K.
|-
| ??
| J
| 37.2
| 193
| M
| Failing LoS routes to L. Appears to be fixed routing based on composition but still plays the LoS routing animation.
|-
|}
=See Also=
{{Mechanics}}
=FAQ=
=FAQ=