- Welcome to the Kancolle Wiki!
- If you have any questions regarding site content, account registration, etc., please visit the KanColle Wiki Discord
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 348:
Line 348: − + − + − + − + − + − − - Same as above, if either attack could wreck the enemy (eg. low armor w/ high evasion), preferably use DA due to higher chance of hitting the target. − − - Despite highest activation rate, CI + radar setup provides a chance (~40%) to trigger secondary gun CI, which has only '''''110%''''' damage modifier post-cap. This could be awkward when facing heavy armor enemies. − + − − - Works well with AP shells. Recommended when dealing with [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/Battleship_Ru-Class Ru-Class Battleships] and above. − − - Highest damage (single strike): '''''130%''''' damage for AP shell CI, o''r '''150%, '''for AP shell hybrid setup.'' − − - Accuracy plays an important role in CI, since you have only one chance to hit the enemy (2 for DA). − − - Since AP shells are not accessible to CA(V), their maximum CI damage is '''''120% post cap''''' with radar. However, if secondary-gun hybrid is used for CA, it could be 130%, but reliability has not been tested. ''(Lower shelling accuracy expected? Same trigger rate as BB(V)?).'' + + + + + + + + + + + + − + − +
→General:
- If each attack is counted separately, DA doesn't seem to increase shelling accuracy.
- If each attack is counted separately, DA doesn't seem to increase shelling accuracy.
- More dependent on shelling accuracy if you wish to maximize your damage output ('''''120% post cap''''' x 2)
- More dependent on shelling accuracy if you wish to maximize your damage output ('''''120%''''' x 2)
- Using appropriate caliber gun set up (eg. 35.6cm x 2 on Fuso), ceteris paribus, BB would have higher DA accuracy than CA.
- Using appropriate caliber gun set up (eg. 35.6cm x 2 on Fuso), ceteris paribus, BB(V) would have higher DA accuracy than CA.
- If Head-On, T-disadvantage and/or low firepower, DA would usually be a double-scratch on the enemy with heavy armor (unless critical).
- <u>For CA(V) using DA setup + radar</u>: If head-On, T-disadvantage and/or low firepower, DA would usually be a double-scratch on the enemy with heavy armor (unless critical).
- Not feasible with AP shell, unless using hybrid setup (much less DA chance expected).
- <u>For BB(V) using DA setup + radar</u>: If high activation rate (eg. flagship) guaranteed, DA is recommended when facing enemy with lower armor than [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/Battleship_Ru-Class Ru-Class Battleships]. i.e. If either attack could wreck the enemy, preferably using DA due to higher chance of hitting the target.
- If high activation rate (eg. flagship) guaranteed, DA is recommended when facing enemy with lower armor than or equivalent to [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/Battleship_Ru-Class Ru-Class Battleships].
- AP shells are accessible to BB(V), but provides a lower base DA chance. Once activated, the damage output could be devastating, but accuracy is not guaranteed.
=== CI: ===
=== CI: ===
- Activate frequently during daytime battle (w/ radar), more reliable trigger-rate-wisely.
- Activate frequently during daytime battle (w/ radar), more reliable trigger-rate-wisely.
- It gives accuracy boost.
- It gives accuracy boost.
- If you're confident with your firepower, avoiding overkill on weak enemies and/or pursuing higher activation rate, CI + radar is a good choice.
- If you're confident with your firepower, avoiding overkill on weak enemies and/or pursuing higher activation rate, CI + radar is usually a good choice. (eg. to prevent ships from stealing MVP)
- <u>For CA(V) using CI setup + radar:</u>
* Maximum damage is '''''120% post cap '''''when radar CI is triggered.
* Despite the highest activation rate, it provides a chance (~40%) to trigger secondary gun CI, which has only '''110%''' damage modifier post-cap. This could be awkward when facing heavy armor enemies.
- <u>For CA(V) using secondary gun hybrid setup</u>:
* Since an additional secondary gun is added, while the CI damage modifier is '''130% post-cap''', this setup is more powerful when accuracy is guaranteed.
* More CI expected than DA.
* However, this setup does not provide vital accuracy bonus. And the trigger rates, however, needs to be further tested.
- <u>For BB(V) using AP shell</u>:
* '''''130%''' damage for CI setup + AP''
* '''150%, '''for AP shell hybrid setup.
* Preliminary study showed AP shell could provide 10+ additional firepower against enemies with heavy armor.
* Therefore,'' ''recommended when dealing with [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/Battleship_Ru-Class Ru-Class Battleships]and above.
=== General: ===
=== General: ===
- For more information on how firepower affects the effectiveness of artillery spotting, you may consult [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Nainodel/All_About_Firepower#How_much_damage_will_I_deal.3F Comparative study on DA vs CI with sample enemies].
- Comparing the effectiveness of BB(V) using AP hybrid setup, [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Nainodel/All_About_Firepower#How_much_damage_will_I_deal.3F Comparative study on DA vs CI with sample enemies].
- Although it is still uncertain that if using 46cm triple on normal BB(V)s (eg. Kongou Class) would affect DA/CI accuracy, you may consult the following link as reference: [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Homuhomu123/Accuracy_Test_Results_(Source_to_be_cited)#II_-_Preliminary_Test_on_the_Overweight_Penalty_.28SOURCE_UNKNOWN.29 Preliminary test results on the overweight penalty]
- Although it is still uncertain that if using 46cm triple on non-Yamato class BB would affect their DA/CI accuracy, you may consult the following link as reference: [http://kancolle.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Homuhomu123/Accuracy_Test_Results_(Source_to_be_cited)#II_-_Preliminary_Test_on_the_Overweight_Penalty_.28SOURCE_UNKNOWN.29 Preliminary test results on the overweight penalty]