** There is a LoS check for F → I. Using a composition that fails this check will to go H instead.
** There is a LoS check for F → I. Using a composition that fails this check will to go H instead.
** H is generally an easier node than I, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.
** H is generally an easier node than I, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.
−
*** 29~30.88 [[Line of_Sight#Effective_Line_of_Sight_.28new_formula.29|Refined LoS]] guarantees going H and passing the second LoS check (source required). 31 LoS is similar but has a small chance go to I. 32+ LoS guarantees I.
+
*** LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] in range 40-43 guarantees going H and passing the second LoS check (source required).
** The major weakness of this setup are the two DDs which are both vulnerable and which don't contribute much offensive power.
** The major weakness of this setup are the two DDs which are both vulnerable and which don't contribute much offensive power.
*'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->
*'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->