Changes

| Map = 6-2 BFEHK

| Map = 6-2 BFEHK

| AS = 252

| AS = 252

| Notes = BFHK is a nearly impossible routing as it requires failing LoS for H but passing LoS for K, a very narrow margin}}

| Notes = BFHK requires failing LoS for H but passing LoS for K, a very narrow margin}}

| {{AirControlSystem

| {{AirControlSystem

| Map = 6-2 BFIK

| Map = 6-2 BFIK

*** There is a LoS check for F → I. Using a composition that fails this check will to go H instead.  

*** There is a LoS check for F → I. Using a composition that fails this check will to go H instead.  

*** H is generally an easier node than I, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.  

*** H is generally an easier node than I, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.  

**** 29~30.88 [[Line of_Sight#Effective_Line_of_Sight_.28new_formula.29|Refined LoS]] guarantees going H and passing the second LoS check {{Citation needed}}. 31 LoS is similar but has a small chance go to I. 32+ LoS guarantees I.

**** 29~30.88 [[Line of_Sight#Effective_Line_of_Sight_.28new_formula.29|Refined LoS]] guarantees going H and passing the second LoS check (source required). 31 LoS is similar but has a small chance go to I. 32+ LoS guarantees I.

*** The major weakness of this setup are the two DDs which are both vulnerable and which don't contribute much offensive power.

*** The major weakness of this setup are the two DDs which are both vulnerable and which don't contribute much offensive power.

**'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->

**'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->