Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| =[[Asahi]]= | | =[[Asahi]]= |
| ==CT== | | ==CT== |
| + | *if only asahi in fleet and not flag ==> no CT bonus, no surface ship malus, no SS bonus |
| + | *if only asahi flag ==> surface ship malus of ~0.63, SS bonus of ~1.365 |
| + | *if another CT flagship and asahi anywhere in fleet ==> CT bonus applies AND counts asahi as CT [with slightly higher modifier than expected], no surface ship malus, SS bonus of ~1.38, stacking multiplicatively with CT bonus |
| + | *if asahi flag and another CT anywhere in fleet ==> CT bonus applies AND counts asahi as CT [with slightly higher modifier than expected], no surface ship malus, SS bonus of ~1.38 |
| + | *if asahi and another CT anywhere in fleet, but neither flag ==> CT bonus applies BUT doesn't count asahi as CT, nos urfact ship malus, no SS bonus |
| + | *asahi sub bonus difference between with another CT and without shows no difference whether asahi is level 1-9 or level 10-29 |
| | | |
| + | so it seems CT bonus is katori-class intrinsic, but counts all CTs via class type :TanakaW~1: 🚬 |
| | | |
| | | |
− | | + | conclusion can't be drawn for the following points: |
− | | + | *3CT setups? [seems slightly higher than expected, but almost neglectible, missing data points for most exp ranges, might be possible to be explained with minuscle asahi bonus for CT bonus] |
| + | *asahi and another CT in fleet, neither as flag [in particular: is asahi sub bonus active if no CT flagship, but still another in fleet] |
| | | |
| ==AR== | | ==AR== |