Line 664:
Line 664:
* Evasion term can be '''negative''' with the fuel penalty.
* Evasion term can be '''negative''' with the fuel penalty.
* The speed of the fleet is supposed to play a role in evasion. Currently, said increase is either nonexistent or too small to test,
* The speed of the fleet is supposed to play a role in evasion. Currently, said increase is either nonexistent or too small to test,
−
* Using [[AO]] equipped with {{Supplies}} {{EquipmentLink|Underway Replenishment}} is a way to mitigate fuel penalties,
+
* Using {{Supplies}} {{EquipmentLink|Underway Replenishment}} is a way to mitigate fuel penalties,
* Because of the evasion cap, trying to increase evasion above 65 has negligible effects,
* Because of the evasion cap, trying to increase evasion above 65 has negligible effects,
* As most ships are capable of reaching 65 {{Evasion}}, trying to increase evasion using pre-cap means has little to no effect, this includes:
* As most ships are capable of reaching 65 {{Evasion}}, trying to increase evasion using pre-cap means has little to no effect, this includes:
Line 670:
Line 670:
** [[Modernization#Luck Modernization|Luckmodding]] {{Luck}},
** [[Modernization#Luck Modernization|Luckmodding]] {{Luck}},
** Choosing a weaker formation with an evasion bonus (except for [[Vanguard]]).
** Choosing a weaker formation with an evasion bonus (except for [[Vanguard]]).
−
* Historical evasion exists but is not measured due to the limited-time nature of events.
+
* Historical evasion exists but is not always measured due to the limited-time nature of events.
='''Special Cases'''=
='''Special Cases'''=