Line 664: |
Line 664: |
| * Evasion term can be '''negative''' with the fuel penalty. | | * Evasion term can be '''negative''' with the fuel penalty. |
| * The speed of the fleet is supposed to play a role in evasion. Currently, said increase is either nonexistent or too small to test, | | * The speed of the fleet is supposed to play a role in evasion. Currently, said increase is either nonexistent or too small to test, |
− | * Using [[AO]] equipped with {{Supplies}} {{EquipmentLink|Underway Replenishment}} is a way to mitigate fuel penalties, | + | * Using {{Supplies}} {{EquipmentLink|Underway Replenishment}} is a way to mitigate fuel penalties, |
| * Because of the evasion cap, trying to increase evasion above 65 has negligible effects, | | * Because of the evasion cap, trying to increase evasion above 65 has negligible effects, |
| * As most ships are capable of reaching 65 {{Evasion}}, trying to increase evasion using pre-cap means has little to no effect, this includes: | | * As most ships are capable of reaching 65 {{Evasion}}, trying to increase evasion using pre-cap means has little to no effect, this includes: |
Line 670: |
Line 670: |
| ** [[Modernization#Luck Modernization|Luckmodding]] {{Luck}}, | | ** [[Modernization#Luck Modernization|Luckmodding]] {{Luck}}, |
| ** Choosing a weaker formation with an evasion bonus (except for [[Vanguard]]). | | ** Choosing a weaker formation with an evasion bonus (except for [[Vanguard]]). |
− | * Historical evasion exists but is not measured due to the limited-time nature of events. | + | * Historical evasion exists but is not always measured due to the limited-time nature of events. |
| | | |
| ='''Special Cases'''= | | ='''Special Cases'''= |