726
edits
- Welcome to the Kancolle Wiki!
- If you have any questions regarding site content, account registration, etc., please visit the KanColle Wiki Discord
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 373:
Line 373: − + Line 436:
Line 436: + + + + + + + + + +
→Summary
</div></div>
</div></div>
==Summary==
==Efficiency summary==
{| class = "wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
{| class = "wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
!Map
!Map
|'''Low''', extremely cheap
|'''Low''', extremely cheap
|}
|}
This can also be summed in one chart
[[File:MFB Ranking Chart.png|900px|thumb|center]]
<br/>''Note 1: 3-4 fuel usage is the average of both Fast+ and the standard fleet ((250+320) : 2 = 285)''
<br/>''Note 2: 7-3 resource usage considers the Variant 2 comp''
<br/>''Note 3: All ships resource usage are considered to be lv 99, with the only exception of map 6-3 as you need married CL and DDs for OASW''
<br/>''Note 4: Bucket usage might vary in reality so this is just a rough estimate''
----
*Using 3-4 as the threshold for "Desperate Spamming" (as in, you pretty much won't spam this map unless you are really out of time and you are willing to trade the cost just for the fastest rpt gain), any ranking comp that almost hit or exceed the resource usage of 3-4 ranking '''should not be considered''' in the future as it's too expensive. Therefore, as a rule of thumb, if a ranking comp have the sum of '''fuel and ammo > 400''', it should be disregarded as it's too inefficient.
**By that logic, map 4-5 resource usage ''does'' exceed the 400 limit, but I decided to leave it there, as the boss node of 4-5 has a lot of good drops that you maybe interested in. Also, it only barely passes the 400 limit so I can give it an exception for now.
''To-do in the future'': <u>If possible, find a cheaper comp but stronger for more efficiency</u>
==Managing quarterly sortie quests ranking points==
==Managing quarterly sortie quests ranking points==