- Welcome to the Kancolle Wiki!
- If you have any questions regarding site content, account registration, etc., please visit the KanColle Wiki Discord
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ravien"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I agree with you. The fact of using the Saiun or not wasn't a matter of debate though, and more a matter of the mechanics of Saiun in general. Your comment was a targeted comment at the previous stance, which in effect was a nullification, and wasn't really providing any benefit at that point. My comment of opinions was regarding your extremely strong wording on certain topics, specifically for when you state that something is "required." [[User:Ravien|<span style="color:#50c878"><font face="Blackadder ITC" size="5"> Ravien</font> </span>]] <font size="2">([[User talk:Ravien|talk]])</font> 07:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | :I agree with you. The fact of using the Saiun or not wasn't a matter of debate though, and more a matter of the mechanics of Saiun in general. Your comment was a targeted comment at the previous stance, which in effect was a nullification, and wasn't really providing any benefit at that point. My comment of opinions was regarding your extremely strong wording on certain topics, specifically for when you state that something is "required." [[User:Ravien|<span style="color:#50c878"><font face="Blackadder ITC" size="5"> Ravien</font> </span>]] <font size="2">([[User talk:Ravien|talk]])</font> 07:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I believe it could be very beneficial if you could add detailed information regarding [[Saiun]] mechanics to either [[Combat#Engagement_Form_Modifier]] or another section of the combat page, where it would be more readily accessible as a global resource. (Also, four tildes "~" will automatically sign any entries you make) [[User:Ravien|<span style="color:#50c878"><font face="Blackadder ITC" size="5"> Ravien</font> </span>]] <font size="2">([[User talk:Ravien|talk]])</font> 07:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | :I believe it could be very beneficial if you could add detailed information regarding [[Saiun]] mechanics to either [[Combat#Engagement_Form_Modifier]] or another section of the combat page, where it would be more readily accessible as a global resource. (Also, four tildes "~" will automatically sign any entries you make) [[User:Ravien|<span style="color:#50c878"><font face="Blackadder ITC" size="5"> Ravien</font> </span>]] <font size="2">([[User talk:Ravien|talk]])</font> 07:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Sounds good, will add the details to the saiun and combat mechanics page [[User:EchIII|EchIII]] ([[User talk:EchIII|talk]]) 10:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:54, 16 July 2016
Actually, the use of a Saiun isn't a matter of opinion, it's very much fact that some ships are advantaged by preventing a Red-T.
You may wish to refer to here to calculate which ships benefit from avoiding a Red-T here - EchIII
- I agree with you. The fact of using the Saiun or not wasn't a matter of debate though, and more a matter of the mechanics of Saiun in general. Your comment was a targeted comment at the previous stance, which in effect was a nullification, and wasn't really providing any benefit at that point. My comment of opinions was regarding your extremely strong wording on certain topics, specifically for when you state that something is "required." Ravien (talk) 07:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- I believe it could be very beneficial if you could add detailed information regarding Saiun mechanics to either Combat#Engagement_Form_Modifier or another section of the combat page, where it would be more readily accessible as a global resource. (Also, four tildes "~" will automatically sign any entries you make) Ravien (talk) 07:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Sounds good, will add the details to the saiun and combat mechanics page EchIII (talk) 10:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)