- Welcome to the Kancolle Wiki!
- If you have any questions regarding site content, account registration, etc., please visit the KanColle Wiki Discord
Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of destroyers by upgraded maximum stats"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(ignored ship list :() |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I'm also highly in support of making the tables sortable and cleaning them up. Was just thinking about it the other day, actually. [[User:Ravien|Ravien]] ([[User talk:Ravien|talk]]) 18:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | :I'm also highly in support of making the tables sortable and cleaning them up. Was just thinking about it the other day, actually. [[User:Ravien|Ravien]] ([[User talk:Ravien|talk]]) 18:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Refer [[Ship list|here]] for floating header? - [[User:KyoriAsh|KyoriAsh]] ([[User talk:KyoriAsh|talk]]) 20:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:10, 1 July 2016
Sortable tables
I want to make the table on this page and the other EliteX pages sortable to allow people to easily compare ships by one stat. However if there are multiple headers in the table it ends up looking like this: https://i.imgur.com/upZ27JI.png when they get sorted smallest to largest. The three options I've come up with are: removing the inner headers, leaving them in and ignoring how it looks sorted that way, or just not making the tables sortable. Anyone can share their thoughts on this? --Cenyth (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'd remove the inner headers, they're unnecessary if the table is sortable. --HydraGoliath (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Being able to sort ships by stats is a useful feature, so I'm also in favor of removing the inner headers. -Ibaraki Ibuki (talk) 18:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)