Changes

451 bytes removed ,  5 years ago
Line 356: Line 356:  
  |- style="vertical-align: top;"
 
  |- style="vertical-align: top;"
 
  |{{AirControlSystem
 
  |{{AirControlSystem
     | Map  =6-2 ADGK
+
     | Map  =6-2 CEIK
    | AS    =126
  −
    | Fleet =1 CA(V), 2 CL, 3DD
  −
    | Notes =''No'' CVs allowed for this route.
  −
    }}
  −
|{{AirControlSystem
  −
    | Map  =6-2 BEHK
   
     | AS    =252
 
     | AS    =252
 
     | Fleet =2 CLT, 2 CA(V), 2CV or 1 CV & 1 BB
 
     | Fleet =2 CLT, 2 CA(V), 2CV or 1 CV & 1 BB
     | Notes =BFHK requires failing LoS for H but passing LoS for K, a very narrow margin}}
+
     | Notes =Requires failing LoS for I but passing LoS for K, a very narrow margin}}
 
  |{{AirControlSystem
 
  |{{AirControlSystem
     | Map  =6-2 BFIK
+
     | Map  =6-2 CEJK
 
     | AS    =153
 
     | AS    =153
 
     | Fleet =1 BB(V), 1 CV, 2DD, 2 CLT/CA(V)
 
     | Fleet =1 BB(V), 1 CV, 2DD, 2 CLT/CA(V)
Line 374: Line 368:  
  |}
 
  |}
   −
*'''B-F-H/I-K''' : 1BB(V), 1CV, 2DD, 2CA(V) or 1BB(V), 1CV, 2DD, 2CLT
+
*'''C-E-I/J-K''' : 1BB(V), 1CV, 2DD, 2CA(V) or 1BB(V), 1CV, 2DD, 2CLT
 
** There is a LoS check for E → J (LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] > 51 needed for E → J). Using a composition that fails this check will to go I instead.  
 
** There is a LoS check for E → J (LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] > 51 needed for E → J). Using a composition that fails this check will to go I instead.  
 
*** I is generally an easier node than J, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.  
 
*** I is generally an easier node than J, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.  
 
*** LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] in range 41-44 guarantees going I and passing the second LoS check.
 
*** LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] in range 41-44 guarantees going I and passing the second LoS check.
*'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->
+
*'''C-E-F-I-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB
 
** Higher chance to kill the boss, but not as efficient for farming.
 
** Higher chance to kill the boss, but not as efficient for farming.
 
** 2CV setup for this route might be better, as Pattern 1 at E node requires relatively large amount of AS (on top of boss having 50% chance of requiring 126 or higher air power for AS). Remember that you probably want bombers in larger slots so you don't run the risk of having them all shot down, rendering your CVs unable to attack during shelling.
 
** 2CV setup for this route might be better, as Pattern 1 at E node requires relatively large amount of AS (on top of boss having 50% chance of requiring 126 or higher air power for AS). Remember that you probably want bombers in larger slots so you don't run the risk of having them all shot down, rendering your CVs unable to attack during shelling.
*'''A-D-G-K''': CA(V), 2CL, 3DD (Unknown LOS check on G-K). Strongly recommended to use a CAV with at least a seaplane bomber.
  −
** Note that you only have 50% chance for air superiority/supremacy in this case (you won't have nearly enough AS for Pattern 2).
      
===Nodes And Enemy Encounters===
 
===Nodes And Enemy Encounters===
739

edits