3,623
edits
Changes
mLine 8:
Line 8: + + +
no edit summary
:: Never mind I confirmed it (neutralizing flagship sub @ E-2 B node) [[User:Yamato JagdYamato|Yamato JagdYamato]] ([[User talk:Yamato JagdYamato|talk]]) 17:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC -8)
:: Never mind I confirmed it (neutralizing flagship sub @ E-2 B node) [[User:Yamato JagdYamato|Yamato JagdYamato]] ([[User talk:Yamato JagdYamato|talk]]) 17:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC -8)
::So, just to clarify in case of confusion: The condition is to sink six subs. This CAN be the flagship sub, but it really is just sinking six subs. I saw a friend do it on 1-5. [[User:Acecipher|Acecipher]] ([[User talk:Acecipher|talk]]) 08:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
::So, just to clarify in case of confusion: The condition is to sink six subs. This CAN be the flagship sub, but it really is just sinking six subs. I saw a friend do it on 1-5. [[User:Acecipher|Acecipher]] ([[User talk:Acecipher|talk]]) 08:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
==Archiving==
One point [[User:Anged Obscurite]] and I brought up early on in the event was the expedience of having multiple articles to house the event map content. Currently, for someone with a low-spec setup and dismally slow internet, the page is a hassle to load up for viewing and is even harder to edit (though a lot of this may have been server load in the heat of the event..?). For the purpose of housing historical event content on the wiki, can we discuss forking it in the same fashion as wikiwiki's articles? As you've probably seen, they have a page for E-1 to E-4 and an additional one for E-5 to E-7. Posting on-site seems to draw more constructive input, so I'll put this here. '''Of course''', the event isn't over at the time of writing, so this is an issue for the coming weeks (or much later, given our trend). Thanks. [[User:Wsewolod|Wsewolod]] ([[User talk:Wsewolod|talk]]) 16:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)