Changes

166 bytes removed ,  5 years ago
Line 380: Line 380:  
** H is generally an easier node than I, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.  
 
** H is generally an easier node than I, so failing this LoS check is largely preferable.  
 
*** LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] in range 40-43 guarantees going H and passing the second LoS check.
 
*** LoS [[Line of Sight#Equipment LoS weighting modifier|F33(C<sub>n</sub>=3)]] in range 40-43 guarantees going H and passing the second LoS check.
** The major weakness of this setup are the two DDs which are both vulnerable and which don't contribute much offensive power.
   
*'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->
 
*'''B-F-E-H-K''' : 2CLT, 2CA(V), 2CV or 2CLT, 2CA(V), 1CV, 1BB <!-- (29+ Refined LoS guarantees H-K) -->
** Higher chance to kill the boss, but not as efficient for farming. Can guarantee the H node path, though.
+
** Higher chance to kill the boss, but not as efficient for farming.
 
** 2CV setup for this route might be better, as Pattern 1 at E node requires relatively large amount of AS (on top of boss having 50% chance of requiring 126 or higher air power for AS). Remember that you probably want bombers in larger slots so you don't run the risk of having them all shot down, rendering your CVs unable to attack during shelling.
 
** 2CV setup for this route might be better, as Pattern 1 at E node requires relatively large amount of AS (on top of boss having 50% chance of requiring 126 or higher air power for AS). Remember that you probably want bombers in larger slots so you don't run the risk of having them all shot down, rendering your CVs unable to attack during shelling.
 
*'''A-D-G-K''': CA(V), 2CL, 3DD (Unknown LOS check on G-K). Strongly recommended to use a CAV with at least a seaplane bomber.
 
*'''A-D-G-K''': CA(V), 2CL, 3DD (Unknown LOS check on G-K). Strongly recommended to use a CAV with at least a seaplane bomber.
739

edits