42,828
edits
Changes
mLine 39:
Line 39: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Flag Ship Priority: thx fourinone
===Flag Ship Priority===
===Flag Ship Priority===
When several ships have the same range, the chance of anyu of them attacking 1st is random, but not equal.
When several ships share the same range, the chance of any of them attacking first is random, but not uniformly random.
*Some orders are weighted more commonly than others for reasons not fully understood yet.
;Notes
*This can notably affect mechanics where it is preferable to have the flagship attack first, like in [[Special Attacks]], as it is preferable to have the flagship attack fist to trigger the attack, before having any chance of being disabled.
*So far, no tests can include all possible range combinations (''there are 335916 combinations in total''). So far tests:
**Focuses on fleets with a common range across the fleet, or with the tow fists ships with a same high range, as those situations are the most common and useful gameplaywise.
**Omit fleets with fewer ships (2, 3, & 5), as they are not common, focusing on 4, 6, & 7 ships fleets..
**Omit "Longest Range" as it is rarely used.
;Practical case - Flagship priority
For fleets with 6 ships (single & combined), if the flagship shares its range with a second one (e.g. in a [[Special Attack]]), the flagship has about up to 50% and down to 20% chance of attacking first.
*This is explained by some range combination nerfing the 1st attack rate of the flagshi^p
Where are ranges A > B > C > D, combos confirmed to nerf rate of flagship shelling 1st, worst to least-bad, where "A/A/C/B/B/B" can mean ships with ranges in order of "VL/VL/S/M/M/M", or "VL/VL/M/L/L/L", or "VL/VL/S/L/L/L" etc...
*Those are preliminary tests and will be updated once enough data will be collected.
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sortable"
!Range Order!!Rate of flagship<br>1st attacking
|-
|A/A/B/B/B/B||46.7%~47.7%
|-
|A/A/C/C/B/C||43.6%~46.5%
|-
|A/A/C/B/C/C||41.9%~44.6%
|-
|A/A/C/C/C/B||41.2%~44.3%
|-
|A/A/D/B/D/C||36.7%~45.3%
|-
|A/A/D/D/B/C||32.1%~46.2%
|-
|A/A/D/C/B/D||32.7%~44.5%
|-
|A/A/C/C/B/B||37.2%~40.0%
|-
|A/A/C/B/B/C||37.2%~39.4%
|-
|A/A/D/B/C/D||36.2%~40.0%
|-
|A/A/C/B/C/B||35.0%~38.5%
|-
|A/A/D/C/B/C||21.2%~32.7%
|-
|A/A/D/B/C/C||23.3%~29.7%
|-
|A/A/C/B/B/B||25.0%~27.3%
|-
|A/A/D/C/C/B||16.0%~34.0%
|-
|A/A/D/B/B/C||13.5%~27.5%
|-
|A/A/D/C/B/B||0.1%~23.1%
|}
''Sources: [https://twitter.com/Xe_UCH/status/1027345820293586944] [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z4RrW53_8O1bh-e3BIL3ca-rYRiN6wemThynKJnJJZk/edit#gid=0] [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1l3GyxAGU-BF8eRGIza8H8X0PPRbaIrGCQtC_PRaweww/edit#gid=0] [https://cc-jabberwock.hatenablog.com/entry/2023/01/28/230903]
=Targeting=
=Targeting=