739
edits
Changes
→Efficiency summary
<br/>''Note 2: 7-3 resource usage considers the Variant 2 comp''
<br/>''Note 2: 7-3 resource usage considers the Variant 2 comp''
<br/>''Note 3: All ships resource usage are considered to be lv 99, with the only exception of map 6-3 as you need married CL and DDs for OASW''
<br/>''Note 3: All ships resource usage are considered to be lv 99, with the only exception of map 6-3 as you need married CL and DDs for OASW''
<br/>''Note 4: Bucket usage might vary in reality so this is just a rough estimate''
<br/>''Note 4: Bucket usage might vary in reality so this is just a rough estimation''
----
----
*Using 3-4 as the threshold for "Desperate Spamming" (as in, you pretty much won't spam this map unless you are really out of time and you are willing to trade the cost just for the fastest rpt gain), any ranking comp that almost hit or exceed the resource usage of 3-4 ranking '''should not be considered''' in the future as it's too expensive. Therefore, as a rule of thumb, if a ranking comp have the sum of '''fuel and ammo > 400''', it should be disregarded as it's too inefficient.
*Using 3-4 as the threshold for "Desperate Spamming" (as in, you pretty much won't spam this map unless you are really out of time and you are willing to trade the cost just for the fastest rpt gain), any ranking comp that almost hit or exceed the resource usage of 3-4 ranking '''should not be considered''' in the future as it's too expensive. Therefore, as a rule of thumb, if a ranking comp have the sum of '''fuel and ammo > 400''', it should be disregarded as it's too inefficient.