cssedit, Moderators
1,520
edits
Changes
User:Grunilg/Fall 2019 Post-Event Survey (view source)
Revision as of 17:52, 20 January 2020
, 4 years ago→Page 1
Page 1 generally had two purposes: To get the rough overview over the Event and to be able to compare how representative this survey is compared to Database and Official Data. It also allows me to filter specific Questions by Demographic later.
Page 1 generally had two purposes: To get the rough overview over the Event and to be able to compare how representative this survey is compared to Database and Official Data. It also allows me to filter specific Questions by Demographic later.
Let's start off with Questions 1,3,4,5,6,7,8: Event clear and the difficulties chosen on each map compared against official Data ([https://twitter.com/KanColle_STAFF/status/1216963143856877568 official KC Twitter]) and Database submission ([https://twitter.com/FlatIsNice/status/1216892278104645634 Tibot Twitter]). Obviously, our sample size is significantly smaller than both of those.
Let's start off with '''Questions 1,3,4,5,6,7,8:''' Event clear and the difficulties chosen on each map compared against official Data ([https://twitter.com/KanColle_STAFF/status/1216963143856877568 official KC Twitter]) and Database submission ([https://twitter.com/FlatIsNice/status/1216892278104645634 Tibot Twitter]). Obviously, our sample size is significantly smaller than both of those.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
<small>SR = Survey, TB = Tibi/Database, KC = Official KC Twitter</small>
<small>SR = Survey, TB = Tibi/Database, KC = Official KC Twitter</small>
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"><h4>Survey Table and Bar Chart</h4>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
{| class="wikitable"
!
! E1
! E2
! E3
! E4
! E5
! E6
|-
| DNF
| 2
| 5
| 5
| 7
| 17
| 26
|-
| Casual
| 2
| 8
| 11
| 19
| 16
| 63
|-
| Easy
| 24
| 34
| 87
| 114
| 163
| 103
|-
| Medium
| 46
| 38
| 59
| 76
| 247
| 153
|-
| Hard
| 422
| 412
| 334
| 281
| 55
| 153
|}
[[file:Page_1.png|thumb|right|Clear Rates per Map]]
</div></div>
'''Conclusion:''' The clear rates on a per-map basis are higher than the official one. This should be fairly obvious as the people filling out this Survey are more likely to have higher engagement in the game.
'''Conclusion:''' The clear rates on a per-map basis are higher than the official and DB one. This should be fairly obvious as the people filling out this Survey are more likely to have higher engagement in the game.
Difficulty chosen on E5 on this survey is higher than the official tweet suggests (with Easy and Medium being equal), likewise E6 was cleared on mostly Medium and Hard in this survey instead of an even Hard-Medium-Easy split as the tweet suggests (unless our Casual percentage is way higher than the official one, but all other Data suggests otherwise).
Difficulty chosen on E5 on this survey is higher than the official tweet suggests (with Easy and Medium being equal), likewise E6 was cleared on mostly Medium and Hard in this survey instead of an even Hard-Medium-Easy split as the tweet and DB suggests (unless our Casual percentage is way higher than the official one, but all other Data suggests otherwise).
The notion of high (or long term) engagement to the Game is reinforced by Question 2: "How many Events have you participated in including this Event?", with less than 13% only having participated in 4 Events or less including this one.
The notion of high (or long term) engagement to the Game is reinforced by Question 2: "How many Events have you participated in including this Event?", with less than 13% only having participated in 4 Events or less including this one.